How do politicians exploit tragic events for political gain, and what was the reaction to such exploitation following the Munich vehicle attack?

Following the Munich vehicle attack that injured 36 people, Bavarian Prime Minister Marcus Zuro quickly shifted from expressing grief for victims to promoting his tough immigration stance. Trade union member Michael Jaeger criticized this rapid pivot, noting that Zuro spent only brief moments acknowledging the tragedy before launching into his usual anti-immigration rhetoric. This exploitation of tragedy for political messaging deeply shocked trade union members, who emphasize solidarity over divisive politics. Jaeger's outrage highlights how politicians can opportunistically use violent incidents to advance their existing political agendas, often before proper investigation or mourning has occurred. The incident demonstrates the tension between genuine concern for victims and the temptation to capitalize on public fear and emotion for political advantage, raising questions about appropriate responses to tragedy in political discourse.