What was the outcome of the trial and why does the defense attorney believe it was justified?

The jury delivered an extraordinarily quick verdict affirming the defendant's innocence. Defense Attorney Alan Jackson explained that his client had maintained innocence from the beginning, even turning down a plea deal with minimal jail time because he was innocent. Jackson contends that the case was an extortion scheme that 'played out live in color in court,' which the jury clearly recognized. He argues that the prosecution should instead focus on prosecuting Tyrell Efron, who apparently admitted to perjury and committed extortion. The swift verdict demonstrates that the jury saw through the deceptive claims presented during the trial.