Protective Orders
What can law enforcement do to better protect victims of domestic violence before it's too late?
Law enforcement faces resource limitations when protecting domestic violence victims. They can't assign every victim their own officer, but they do provide protective orders, connect victims with counselors and shelters, and make arrests when orders are violated. However, as the expert notes, protective orders are 'just a piece of paper' that determined offenders will ignore. The most effective solution is creating opportunities for victims to completely separate from their abusers, as removing them from dangerous situations is ultimately the best way to prevent violence from escalating to deadly levels.
Watch clip answer (01:04m)
Law&Crime Network
09:39 - 10:43
What type of subpoenas did Blake Lively's legal team issue in their lawsuit against Justin Baldoni?
Blake Lively's legal team issued subpoenas to major cellular providers including AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile, seeking extensive communication records. These subpoenas request all documents concerning calls and text messages related to phone numbers belonging to Wayfarer parties, their employees, and various non-party individuals. The requested information includes call logs, text logs, data logs, and cell site location information spanning multiple years - from December 1, 2022 to the present. This wide-ranging discovery effort appears aimed at uncovering evidence related to Lively's allegations of sexual harassment and a retaliatory smear campaign by Baldoni.
Watch clip answer (00:38m)
Law&Crime Network
05:24 - 06:02
What privacy concerns are raised by Blake Lively's subpoenas in her legal battle with Justin Baldoni?
Blake Lively's legal team has issued extensive subpoenas seeking complete call and text histories, real-time location information, and web browsing data over several years from multiple targets. These requests are considered wildly disproportionate to the case's needs and potentially violate multiple legal protections including attorney-client privilege, spousal privilege, and physician-patient privilege. The subpoenas have been criticized for unnecessarily invading the privacy of numerous third parties including family members, friends, business partners, and essentially anyone who communicated with the targets. This extensive reach appears to go beyond legitimate discovery purposes, potentially abusing the civil litigation process while compromising the privacy of individuals not directly involved in the legal dispute.
Watch clip answer (00:47m)
Law&Crime Network
08:12 - 09:00
What is the controversy between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni regarding subpoenas in their legal dispute?
The controversy centers on what Baldoni's legal team describes as 'overbroad subpoenas' issued by Lively's team to major cellular providers (AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile). These subpoenas seek extensive communication records including call logs, text logs, data logs, and cell site location information from multiple parties involved in the case, including Wayfarer employees and non-party individuals. The subpoenas request all documents concerning ingoing and outgoing communications over a lengthy period spanning from December 1, 2022, to the present. Baldoni's team has filed a letter with Judge Lewis J. Lyman to raise concerns about this discovery issue, suggesting the scope of these requests is excessive and potentially problematic.
Watch clip answer (00:54m)
Law&Crime Network
05:08 - 06:02
Do individuals have legal recourse if their personal data is released due to political targeting?
According to Berit Berger, former federal prosecutor, this is largely unknown territory, but her short answer is 'yes, I hope so.' She believes there should be laws protecting individuals from vindictive actions where a political enemy's personal data is released. However, she acknowledges we're in new territory, as seen with security details being released. Despite the uncertainty, Berger expresses confidence that courts, which dislike chaotic systems, would provide some sort of last resort for people specifically targeted because of their political beliefs or positions. This suggests that while the legal landscape is evolving, there likely exists some form of protection against politically motivated privacy violations.
Watch clip answer (00:46m)
MSNBC
10:41 - 11:27
What legal protections exist against the federal government if your personal data gets revealed?
There are laws that require the government to treat personal data with utmost care and privacy. If data leaks occur, individuals have legal recourse through civil suits and potentially criminal charges if information was released negligently or irresponsibly. While enforcement may vary, these laws establish protections for citizens whose personal information might be compromised. The legal framework is designed to safeguard privacy rights while still allowing legitimate fraud prevention efforts to continue, as has been the practice across both Democratic and Republican administrations.
Watch clip answer (01:27m)MSNBC
09:12 - 10:39