Michael McFaul
How has the Kremlin responded to Trump's recent comments on Ukraine?
The Kremlin has enthusiastically embraced Trump's position on Ukraine, with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov praising Trump as 'the only Western leader who has publicly said that one of the root causes of the Ukrainian situation was the impudent line to draw Ukraine into NATO.' McFaul describes this reaction as 'beyond their wildest dreams.' Russia sees Trump's statements as signaling alignment with their position, particularly regarding territorial demands and Ukraine's neutrality. Rather than pressuring Russia for negotiations, Trump's approach appears to be putting demands on Ukraine while conceding key Russian objectives before negotiations even begin.
Watch clip answer (02:08m)What does former Ambassador McFaul think of President Trump's comments about Ukraine and Zelensky?
Ambassador Michael McFaul finds Trump's comments calling Zelensky a dictator 'shocking,' 'appalling,' and 'embarrassing.' He expresses deep concern that such statements damage America's global reputation and weaken its position internationally. McFaul emphasizes that these comments undermine Ukrainian soldiers fighting for freedom against Russian invasion and present a troubling shift in American foreign policy. He worries that Trump's remarks suggest America might be switching sides in the conflict, causing people worldwide to question which side the United States will support - democrats or autocrats - in this critical geopolitical struggle.
Watch clip answer (01:38m)How has the Trump administration's stance on Ukraine surprised and benefited Russia?
The Trump administration's stance on Ukraine has exceeded Russia's expectations in ways they never imagined possible. While Russians anticipated some pressure for negotiations following Trump's election, they did not expect the administration to signal willingness to concede everything Russia wanted from the beginning. The administration has already supported key Russian demands - giving up Ukrainian territories, accepting Ukraine's neutrality outside NATO, and lifting sanctions. Adding further advantage to Russia, Trump officials are making demands of Ukraine's democratically elected President Zelensky while making no comparable demands of Putin, who has been in power as a dictator for 25 years. This approach has put Russia in an unexpectedly strong negotiating position.
Watch clip answer (01:32m)What is Michael McFaul's reaction to President Trump's comments calling Zelensky a dictator?
Michael McFaul finds Trump's comments about Zelensky shocking, appalling, and embarrassing as an American. He expresses particular embarrassment on behalf of Ukrainian soldiers fighting for freedom against Russian invasion, emphasizing that these soldiers know who truly started the war. McFaul argues that it is not in America's national interest for a U.S. President to speak this way about Ukraine's leadership. He believes such rhetoric weakens America's position not just in Europe but globally, undermining U.S. credibility and its support for Ukraine in defending against Russian aggression.
Watch clip answer (00:38m)What is significant about the US-Russia talks in Saudi Arabia?
These talks represent the first US-Russia diplomatic engagement since the Ukraine war began nearly three years ago. Key American officials including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Riyadh for an extensive four-and-a-half-hour discussion. The high-stakes meeting focused on potential pathways to end the conflict in Ukraine, marking a critical diplomatic effort after years of limited formal communication between the two powers. This represents a significant diplomatic development in addressing one of the most consequential geopolitical conflicts of recent years.
Watch clip answer (00:20m)What was the key disagreement between US and Russian officials during their recent talks in Saudi Arabia?
According to Ambassador McFaul, the US and Russian delegations had fundamentally different objectives for the meeting. The Russian officials, particularly Putin's foreign policy adviser Ushukov, wanted to focus on restarting bilateral US-Russian relations across multiple issues beyond Ukraine. In contrast, the American delegation was there specifically to initiate peace negotiations regarding the Ukraine conflict. This fundamental misalignment of purposes prevented any meaningful agreement from being reached during these talks, as neither side was addressing the same core agenda.
Watch clip answer (00:59m)