Investigative Reporting
How has Israel violated the ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah?
Al Jazeera's digital investigation team, Sanad, has uncovered a pattern of Israeli military activities that contradict the November 2024 ceasefire terms. According to their findings, Israel has failed to halt military operations in Lebanon and begin the promised gradual withdrawal from the south, as required by the 60-day truce agreement. The investigation reveals that Israeli forces have continued significant military activities despite the ceasefire, which officially began on November 27, 2024. These activities undermine the agreement's fundamental requirements, where Israel was supposed to stop military operations while Hezbollah and other armed groups halted attacks on Israel.
Watch clip answer (00:39m)
Al Jazeera English
00:00 - 00:39
How has Israel responded to the ceasefire agreement with Lebanon?
Israel has violated the ceasefire agreement with Lebanon that was set to begin November 27, 2024. Despite an initial withdrawal deadline of January 26 that was extended to February 18, Israel has refused to remove its troops, blaming Lebanon for not upholding its side of the agreement. According to evidence investigated by Al Jazeera's Sanad team, Israel has chosen to violate the ceasefire rather than use it as a step toward de-escalation. The Israeli military continues operations in key areas, expanding territorially and demolishing civilian structures instead of withdrawing as agreed.
Watch clip answer (00:32m)Al Jazeera English
05:16 - 05:49
How did Israeli military zones change after the November 2024 ceasefire with Hezbollah?
Just one day after the November 27, 2024 ceasefire took effect, the Israeli military published a new map establishing expanded restricted zones in southern Lebanon. This map revealed that the restricted areas doubled in size compared to pre-ceasefire territories. Before the truce, Israeli forces controlled approximately 160 square kilometers, but the new restricted zones expanded to cover 320 square kilometers. Instead of withdrawing as expected under the ceasefire terms, Israeli forces continued ground operations and demolitions while warning Lebanese residents against returning to their homes in these expanded areas.
Watch clip answer (00:52m)Al Jazeera English
02:34 - 03:27
How much government fraud is estimated to occur annually according to the Wall Street Journal?
According to a Wall Street Journal editorial referenced in the clip, federal government fraud is estimated to be between $233 billion and $521 billion annually. This staggering figure stands in stark contrast to how some media outlets have portrayed the issue, with the host noting that certain 'tribunes of truth in the press' claim that government fraud is merely 'a mirage.' The clip suggests there's a significant disconnect between media narratives and the actual scale of government fraud, similar to how other issues like border security have been downplayed.
Watch clip answer (00:22m)
Fox News
00:20 - 00:43
What does the Adam Toledo shooting case reveal about police accountability and systemic issues in law enforcement?
The Adam Toledo shooting case exemplifies the ongoing crisis of police violence against Black and minority communities in America. The 13-year-old was killed by Chicago police officers, with video evidence directly contradicting the official police narrative that claimed Toledo was armed during the confrontation. This discrepancy between police accounts and actual footage highlights systemic problems with law enforcement accountability and transparency. John Oliver emphasizes that such incidents represent a destructive cycle of violence, protests, and inadequate police response that continues to repeat itself. The case demonstrates how official statements from police, mayors, and prosecutors can be misleading or false, underscoring the urgent need for comprehensive reform in law enforcement practices. The tragedy calls for both acknowledgment of these systemic failures and concrete action toward meaningful police reform to prevent future loss of innocent lives.
Watch clip answer (00:28m)
LastWeekTonight
01:40 - 02:08
How do mainstream media outlets handle claims made by public figures like Elon Musk who challenge established narratives?
Mainstream media outlets often exhibit selective scrutiny when dealing with public figures who challenge established narratives. According to the analysis, media organizations tend to overlook essential truths while focusing on nitpicking claims made by figures like Elon Musk. This creates a stark contrast between how genuine investigations into government fund misuse are treated versus the media's defensive reactions to challenges. The segment suggests that media credibility is being questioned in today's polarized landscape, particularly when it comes to their handling of assertions regarding government fraud or misconduct. This selective approach to fact-checking and reporting demonstrates potential bias in how media outlets shape public perception and maintain their preferred narratives.
Watch clip answer (00:15m)
Fox News
27:01 - 27:17