Informed Consent
What legal precaution should be taken when photographing others with a camera phone?
When photographing others with a camera phone, it's essential to obtain written permission rather than verbal consent. As Ed Helms discovered in the case of Helms v. Wong, verbal permission will not hold up in court, potentially leading to legal complications. Camera phones represent a technological advancement that improves users' quality of life while simultaneously creating privacy concerns for others. While these devices offer convenience and functionality, users must balance their technological benefits against the potential invasion of others' privacy rights.
Watch clip answer (00:19m)
The Daily Show
10:58 - 11:18
What did the Delhi High Court rule regarding consensual adolescent relationships under the POCSO Act?
The Delhi High Court observed that it would be harsh and unjust to convict individuals under the POCSO Act without definitive proof of age, especially when the age difference between the minor and the accused is only one or two years. Justice Jasmeet Singh emphasized that criminalizing consensual adolescent relationships with minimal age gaps could lead to miscarriage of justice. However, the Court clarified that this principle would not apply in cases where the minor is under 14 or 15 years old, as the age gap in such situations is significantly larger. The ruling recognizes the importance of balancing child protection with a nuanced understanding of adolescent development and relationships.
Watch clip answer (00:38m)
WION
01:08 - 01:46
What was the basis of the Delhi High Court's ruling regarding a POCSO Act case?
The Delhi High Court upheld a trial court's acquittal of a man under Section 4 of POCSO Act 2012, dismissing the prosecution's appeal. Justice Jasmeet Singh noted that the prosecutrix had clearly stated in her testimony that the relationship and physical relations with the accused were consensual. The court further emphasized that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the prosecutrix was a minor at the time of the incident. This ruling reflects the court's position that adolescents should be allowed to engage in consensual romantic relationships without criminalization, recognizing such relationships as a natural part of human development.
Watch clip answer (00:49m)WION
01:46 - 02:36
What does the Delhi High Court say about adolescent romantic relationships?
The Delhi High Court has ruled that adolescents should be allowed to engage in romantic and consensual relationships without fear of criminalization. Justice Jasmeet Singh emphasized that consensual adolescent love is a natural part of human development, describing it as a fundamental human experience. While acknowledging the importance of legal age of consent for protecting minors, the Court stated that laws should focus on preventing exploitation and abuse rather than punishing consensual relationships. The ruling advocates for societal and legal views to evolve to respect adolescents' rights to form emotional connections that are free from coercion.
Watch clip answer (01:07m)WION
00:00 - 01:08
What is the POCSO Act and what protections does it provide?
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012 was enacted by the Government of India to safeguard children from sexual abuse and offenses. The act clearly defines a child as any person below 18 years of age and provides punishments based on the gravity of the offense committed. The POCSO Act was further reviewed and amended in 2019 to introduce more stringent punishments, including the death penalty for sexual crimes against children. These amendments were implemented with the specific aim of deterring perpetrators and preventing such crimes against children through harsher penalties.
Watch clip answer (00:33m)WION
02:36 - 03:10
What is the Delhi High Court's view on adolescent relationships in the context of POCSO cases?
The Delhi High Court, while dealing with a POCSO case initiated by parents claiming kidnapping, has affirmed that consensual and respectful adolescent love is a natural part of human development. Justice Jasmeet Singh emphasized that adolescents should be allowed to engage in consensual romantic relationships without criminalization. The Court advocates for a balanced legal approach that protects minors from exploitation while respecting their emotional development and right to form consensual relationships. This ruling reflects a progressive interpretation of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, distinguishing between exploitative behavior and natural adolescent relationships.
Watch clip answer (00:17m)
WION
00:08 - 00:25