Logo

Environmental justice

Environmental justice (EJ) refers to the principle that all individuals, irrespective of race, ethnicity, income, or nationality, should receive fair treatment and have meaningful involvement in environmental decision-making processes. This concept emphasizes the need to ensure that no group is disproportionately burdened by environmental hazards such as pollution, toxic waste, or hazardous industrial operations. Originating from the Civil Rights movement, the environmental justice framework seeks to address systemic inequalities that have historically marginalized communities, particularly people of color and low-income populations. It focuses on three core pillars: distributive justice ensuring equitable distribution of environmental risks and benefits, procedural justice advocating for inclusive participation in decision-making, and recognition justice that acknowledges historical oppressed groups and their rights. Recently, environmental justice has gained prominence within governmental and grassroots initiatives as advocates strive to combat issues related to environmental racism and climate inequality. The Biden administration's Justice40 Initiative aims to direct 40% of federal climate and clean energy investments to disadvantaged communities, highlighting the increasing recognition of EJ in environmental policy. In response to ongoing challenges posed by recent policy rollbacks, like those outlined in Project 2025, advocates continue to emphasize the importance of maintaining robust environmental justice frameworks to protect vulnerable populations against the adverse impacts of pollution and climate change. As the movement evolves, it remains integral to the broader objectives of social justice and sustainable development, reinforcing the connection between environmental health and human rights.

Why did federal prosecutor Denise Chung resign from her position?

Denise Chung, who headed criminal prosecutors in the D.C. U.S. attorney's office, resigned after being ordered to freeze EPA funds related to environmental grants issued by the Biden administration. She was instructed to issue a freeze order to a bank without proper justification or factual basis - an unprecedented use of the Justice Department's criminal powers. This represents the first instance in the Trump administration where the DOJ has attempted to use its authority without legitimate predicate, essentially suggesting criminal activity where none was proven. The action violated standard DOJ practices as freezing bank assets typically requires evidence connecting those assets to a crime.

Watch clip answer (02:18m)
Thumbnail

MSNBC

06:27 - 08:45

What is the significance of Banksy's 'Crude Oil Vertriano' painting that's being auctioned?

Banksy's 'Crude Oil Vertriano' is a rare painting being auctioned by Sotheby's, expected to fetch over $6 million. The artwork, currently owned by Blink-182 bassist Mark Hoppus, features Banksy's modifications to Jackson Vettriano's 1992 original piece, including a sinking oil liner and toxic waste barrel. The painting carries a powerful environmental message, highlighting how big businesses damage our environment. Part of the auction proceeds will support victims of the 1995 Los Angeles wildfires, demonstrating how this artwork represents the intersection of artistic expression, environmental activism, and philanthropy.

Watch clip answer (00:38m)
Thumbnail

CBS News

41:51 - 42:30

What is the conflict between residents and baboons in Simonstown, South Africa?

In Simonstown, South Africa, there's a growing conflict between local residents and baboons that frequently raid homes in the area. Peter Willis, a longtime resident, has been forced to implement protective measures for his property against these wild animals, while community activists have raised concerns about increasing aggression toward the baboons. The situation highlights the complex challenges of human-wildlife coexistence in this unique urban setting within a national park. Local authorities face pressure to improve wildlife management practices while residents seek environmentally friendly solutions to protect their homes without harming the animals. The conflict represents a broader debate about responsible wildlife management in areas where human settlements overlap with natural habitats.

Watch clip answer (00:08m)
Thumbnail

Al Jazeera English

02:38 - 02:46

What challenges do residents of Simonstown face with baboons and how are they responding?

Residents of Simonstown in the Cape Peninsula experience frequent baboon raids that cause property damage and disruption as these primates travel from the mountain into the suburbs. Locals like Peter Willis, who has lived there for thirty years, have adopted various protective measures including installing clear bars on windows, halting vegetable gardening that might attract baboons, and relying on community alert systems to warn of approaching troops. However, the situation has escalated beyond peaceful coexistence. While some residents implement passive preventative measures, others have taken more aggressive approaches, with baboons being injured or killed by live ammunition, knives, or paintball guns, raising significant concerns among animal rights activists about the need for better wildlife management strategies.

Watch clip answer (00:52m)
Thumbnail

Al Jazeera English

00:02 - 00:54

What is the main issue facing baboons in Simonstown, South Africa?

The main issue facing baboons in Simonstown is their sudden persecution despite having roamed the area for thousands of years. According to activist Engelbrecht, the root cause is a lack of proper management by South African authorities. This management vacuum has led to escalating human-baboon conflicts. In response, Engelbrecht took legal action last year against the municipality, the national parks agency, and the government organization responsible for nature reserves. His court case aims to force these authorities to implement appropriate wildlife management measures to protect the baboons while addressing community concerns.

Watch clip answer (00:24m)
Thumbnail

Al Jazeera English

01:10 - 01:35

What are the legal disputes between Nigerian communities and Shell about?

The lawsuits against Shell stem from decades of pollution that have devastated local livelihoods in Nigerian communities. Community leaders argue that Shell has a moral obligation to compensate for the destruction caused by its operations, which have contaminated water sources and agricultural lands throughout the Niger Delta region. Shell claims it is not liable for spills caused by third-party actions, though it has acknowledged an obligation to compensate victims in cases where the company is at fault. This creates a complex legal situation where affected communities continue to fight for accountability and proper compensation for the environmental damage that has destroyed their traditional ways of life.

Watch clip answer (00:23m)
Thumbnail

WION

01:53 - 02:17

of3