Enhanced Interrogation

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) refer to a controversial set of methods utilized primarily by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) following the September 11 terrorist attacks. This program, which included methods such as waterboarding, sleep deprivation, and stress positioning, was designed to extract information from terrorism suspects at secret detention sites, commonly known as “black sites.” Advocates of these techniques argue that they are necessary for national security and have contributed to preventing further terrorist attacks. However, critics assert that such methods constitute torture and violate ethical norms, as well as both U.S. and international law governing humane treatment. Research indicates that although EITs have been promoted as effective for intelligence gathering, significant evidence refutes these claims. A 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee report concluded that these interrogation techniques were not only ineffective in eliciting usable information but were also significantly more brutal than previously disclosed. The ethical implications of using psychological and physical stress in interrogations have ignited debate among legal scholars, human rights advocates, and intelligence professionals. Indeed, the legacy of enhanced interrogation techniques remains a contentious subject in contemporary discussions regarding law enforcement practices, interrogation methods, and the balance between national security and human rights standards. Recent shifts in interrogation doctrine emphasize rapport building and non-coercive techniques, highlighting a critical move away from the aggressive strategies of the past, aiming to optimize information gathering while ensuring adherence to ethical standards.