Adverse Drug Reactions
What was the government and institutional response when COVID vaccine trial participants reported severe adverse effects from the AstraZeneca vaccine?
When Brianne Dressen and another participant reported identical severe neurological injuries from the AstraZeneca vaccine trial, the NIH responded within 24 hours to their reports. Despite acknowledging these injuries, government messaging continued to promote vaccine safety, telling people to "go get your shot" while claiming they were just working on FDA paperwork. Ten days after the reports, two significant actions occurred: AstraZeneca was pulled from consideration in the United States, and the National Institutes of Health initiated a formal study to investigate neurological complications following COVID vaccines in general. This response highlighted the disconnect between official safety messaging and the serious adverse events being documented by trial participants.
Watch clip answer (00:47m)
VICE News
16:28 - 17:15
What systemic failures occurred when government health agencies handled COVID vaccine injury reports during the trial phase?
Brianne Dressen reveals a troubling disconnect between private acknowledgment and public statements by health agencies. While the FDA and NIH were holding regular meetings and confirming COVID vaccine injuries in trial participants, these same officials simultaneously appeared in public media denying knowledge of such reactions. This represents a significant failure in transparency and accountability. Government agencies were internally documenting serious neurological complications from vaccine trials while publicly maintaining that vaccine safety concerns were unsubstantiated. The system allowed for the suppression of legitimate injury reports, creating a barrier between clinical evidence and public health communication. Such dual messaging undermines public trust and highlights the need for greater accountability in vaccine safety monitoring and reporting processes.
Watch clip answer (00:44m)
VICE News
41:59 - 42:44
What are the potential implications of RFK Jr.'s appointment as Health and Human Services secretary for vaccine safety oversight and transparency?
RFK Jr.'s appointment as Health and Human Services secretary represents a significant shift in federal health policy, particularly regarding vaccine oversight. Given his history as a vaccine skeptic and President Trump's promise to "open up the books" on COVID vaccine controversies, this appointment signals a potential major investigation into vaccine safety protocols and pharmaceutical industry practices. The appointment comes at a time when vaccine injury cases like Brianne Dressen's are gaining attention, highlighting gaps in the current system's ability to address adverse reactions from clinical trials. This could lead to enhanced transparency requirements for pharmaceutical companies and more robust safety monitoring systems. The implications extend beyond individual cases to broader public health policy, potentially reshaping how vaccine trials are conducted and how adverse events are reported and compensated, fundamentally altering the relationship between government oversight and pharmaceutical accountability.
Watch clip answer (00:58m)
VICE News
00:01 - 00:59
What support systems exist for individuals who have experienced COVID-19 vaccine injuries, and how do these compare to government assistance?
React19, co-founded by Brianne Dressen, has created a comprehensive support network for vaccine-injured individuals that spans over 20 countries. The organization serves as "ground zero" for vaccine injury information, possessing more knowledge than many healthcare providers about these conditions. Their support system includes an underground network of healthcare providers who won't dismiss patients' concerns, along with a medical grant program that has distributed nearly $880,000 to help cover medical expenses. This grassroots effort significantly outpaces government assistance, with the US federal government having paid only around $400,000 total to date. This stark contrast highlights the gap between official support and actual need, demonstrating how community-driven organizations are filling critical healthcare gaps for this vulnerable population.
Watch clip answer (00:35m)
VICE News
01:00:01 - 01:00:37
What legal action is being taken regarding alleged government censorship of vaccine injury victims on social media platforms?
Brianne Dressen and other vaccine injury advocates are pursuing legal action through lawsuits that involve subpoenaing evidence and going through discovery processes to prove government censorship. They allege the federal government, specifically the White House, directed social media platforms like Facebook to restrict or shut down their ability to share their experiences and advocate for vaccine injury awareness. The case is strengthened by recent admissions, including Mark Zuckerberg's acknowledgment that the White House pressured Facebook to censor content. If proven, this would represent a significant case of government collusion with private tech companies to silence victims discussing their medical experiences, which has broader implications for free speech and transparency in public health matters.
Watch clip answer (01:27m)
VICE News
55:18 - 56:46
What happened to Brianne Dressen when she volunteered for COVID-19 vaccine trials, and what legal action is she taking?
Brianne Dressen, a healthy school teacher and mother of two, volunteered for COVID-19 vaccine trials but experienced severe neurological complications following her participation. Her traumatic experience led her to file a groundbreaking lawsuit against AstraZeneca that could potentially transform vaccine safety protocols and accountability measures. Her case highlights critical issues surrounding vaccine transparency, medical responsibility, and the challenges faced by individuals who suffer vaccine-related injuries. The lawsuit aims to address the need for better informed consent processes and reform in vaccine safety protocols, representing a significant legal challenge that could have far-reaching implications for the vaccine industry.
Watch clip answer (00:16m)VICE News
00:38 - 00:54