Logo

Territorial Disputes

What is Lebanon's stance on Israeli presence in Lebanese territory according to the UN Security Council Resolution 1701?

Lebanon demands that the UN Security Council take necessary measures to address Israeli violations and compel Israel to withdraw immediately to international borders in accordance with Resolution 1701. The Lebanese government explicitly considers any continued Israeli presence in Lebanese territory, regardless of size, as an occupation with all corresponding legal consequences under international law. This stance emphasizes Lebanon's position that Israeli forces must completely withdraw from Lebanese soil as mandated by UN resolutions and relevant declarations.

Watch clip answer (00:33m)
Thumbnail

WION

02:48 - 03:21

What is the current status of Israeli troop withdrawal from Lebanon under the U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement?

Israeli forces have partially complied with the U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah by pulling back from border villages in southern Lebanon. However, the Israeli military has stated that troops will remain at five strategic locations along the border. This partial withdrawal has created tension, as Lebanon's government considers the remaining Israeli presence an occupation. Lebanese officials have warned they may use 'all means' to force the remaining troops out, suggesting possible escalation if Israel doesn't complete the withdrawal as stipulated in the agreement.

Watch clip answer (00:31m)
Thumbnail

CBS News

00:00 - 00:32

What does an enduring and successful end to the Ukraine conflict look like?

Secretary Rubio emphasizes that any resolution must be permanent, not temporary. The foundation for peace includes fundamental discussions about territory and security guarantees. These elements are essential to prevent a recurrence of conflict as seen in the past. The ultimate goal is to permanently end the war, stop the ongoing killing and destruction, while establishing lasting geopolitical and economic cooperation. This requires continued engagement from officials to ensure productive negotiations that address both territorial concerns and security needs of all parties involved.

Watch clip answer (01:17m)
Thumbnail

BBC News

00:15 - 01:33

What are the key principles that must guide negotiations to end the war in Ukraine?

The key principles include establishing a permanent end to the war rather than a temporary cessation, discussions about territory, and essential security guarantees. These are described as the 'fundamental basics' that will undergird any negotiation process. The most critical aspect is President Trump's determination to stop the ongoing killing and destruction in eastern and southern Ukraine, which is deemed unacceptable as the conflict continues month after month. The goal is to achieve a lasting peace that addresses both territorial concerns and security requirements for all parties involved.

Watch clip answer (00:52m)
Thumbnail

BBC News

00:53 - 01:46

What is President Zelensky's position on Ukraine's involvement in U.S.-Russia peace talks?

President Zelensky insists that Ukraine must be present in any negotiations between the U.S. and Russia regarding the ongoing conflict. He firmly states that Ukraine will not agree to anything without their direct participation and refuses to engage with Russia until there is a clear plan in place. This stance comes from concerns that America might reach an agreement primarily focused on Russia's interests, potentially forcing Ukraine to make territorial concessions or abandon NATO ambitions. Zelensky's position places Ukraine in a difficult situation if the U.S. proceeds with negotiations that favor Russian demands without adequate Ukrainian input.

Watch clip answer (01:01m)
Thumbnail

BBC News

01:36 - 02:38

What is the latest incident escalating tensions between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea?

The Philippine Coast Guard has accused the Chinese Navy of dangerous flight maneuvers near the Scarborough Shoal. According to Philippine officials, a Chinese Navy helicopter flew as close as 3 meters to a Philippine government aircraft conducting a maritime patrol, which they claim violates aviation regulations. The incident occurred in a prime fishing area within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone. China's Southern Theater Command countered by claiming the Philippine plane intruded into China's airspace over the Scarborough Shoal, violating Chinese sovereignty. This confrontation highlights the ongoing territorial disputes in the South China Sea, a vital waterway that facilitates over $3 trillion in annual trade.

Watch clip answer (01:11m)
Thumbnail

WION

00:03 - 01:15

of23