Soft Power Diplomacy
Could the US lift or ease economic sanctions on Russia?
This question remains significant in US-Russia relations. Previously, President Trump voiced skepticism about economic sanctions, suggesting they could be used as a negotiation tool with Russian President Vladimir Putin. While expressing doubt about their effectiveness, Trump has simultaneously indicated a willingness to leverage sanctions in diplomatic discussions with Russia. Trump hinted that sanctions might serve as a bargaining chip in broader negotiations, potentially signaling an openness to striking a comprehensive deal that addresses multiple aspects of US-Russia relations beyond just economic measures.
Watch clip answer (00:20m)
WION
01:20 - 01:41
Is it possible to reach an agreement with Russia regarding Ukraine?
According to Kurt Volker, former US Ambassador to NATO, while a ceasefire might be possible, he remains very skeptical about reaching any meaningful agreement with Russia. This skepticism stems from Russia's maximalist objectives of eliminating Ukraine as a sovereign state. Volker emphasizes that Russia's fundamental goal of undermining Ukraine's sovereignty creates an insurmountable obstacle to genuine agreement, as no party would consent to the elimination of Ukraine's status as an independent nation. This fundamental contradiction in objectives makes substantive diplomatic progress extremely challenging.
Watch clip answer (00:14m)
Al Jazeera English
01:42 - 01:56
What are the benefits of USAID for the United States?
USAID provides multiple strategic advantages for the United States beyond humanitarian aid. It fights disease before it reaches American borders, creates new markets for U.S. goods, and generates goodwill toward America abroad, building unprecedented soft power that has advanced U.S. interests more effectively than military actions, sanctions, or tariffs. The post-World War II generation recognized that helping others represents a valuable investment. The Marshall Plan wasn't implemented out of sympathy for former enemies, but because America needed to develop markets for its exports. This pragmatic approach to foreign aid continues to serve U.S. interests by combining humanitarian assistance with strategic economic and diplomatic benefits.
Watch clip answer (00:23m)
Philip DeFranco
16:45 - 17:09