Logo

Regulatory Compliance in Pharmaceuticals

What legal protections do pharmaceutical companies have against lawsuits from COVID vaccine injuries, and what recourse do injured individuals have?

Pharmaceutical companies are protected from COVID vaccine injury lawsuits through the PREP Act, which provides blanket immunity under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). This protection extends beyond COVID vaccines to other treatments like remdesivir and monkeypox vaccines, leaving injured individuals with no legal recourse against manufacturers. Currently, over 100 legal challenges to the PREP Act have failed, making Brianne Dressen's AstraZeneca case potentially the first to succeed in challenging this protection. Injured individuals are essentially on their own, with no established support programs or dedicated research into addressing vaccine-related harms. The situation highlights a significant gap in accountability, where those harmed by vaccines have limited options and must often rely on informal networks of other injured individuals to find information and support, creating an urgent need for legal and policy reforms.

Watch clip answer (01:36m)
Thumbnail

VICE News

31:40 - 33:17

What systemic failures occurred when government health agencies handled COVID vaccine injury reports during the trial phase?

Brianne Dressen reveals a troubling disconnect between private acknowledgment and public statements by health agencies. While the FDA and NIH were holding regular meetings and confirming COVID vaccine injuries in trial participants, these same officials simultaneously appeared in public media denying knowledge of such reactions. This represents a significant failure in transparency and accountability. Government agencies were internally documenting serious neurological complications from vaccine trials while publicly maintaining that vaccine safety concerns were unsubstantiated. The system allowed for the suppression of legitimate injury reports, creating a barrier between clinical evidence and public health communication. Such dual messaging undermines public trust and highlights the need for greater accountability in vaccine safety monitoring and reporting processes.

Watch clip answer (00:44m)
Thumbnail

VICE News

41:59 - 42:44

What happened to Brianne Dressen during the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine trial, and what legal action has she taken as a result?

Brianne Dressen experienced severe and traumatic health complications after participating in the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine trial, including significant neurological issues that dramatically impacted her life. Her adverse reactions were so serious that she has filed a groundbreaking lawsuit against AstraZeneca, which could potentially have far-reaching implications for vaccine development and regulation. Her case highlights critical concerns about transparency and accountability in vaccine trials, raising important questions about participant safety monitoring and the need for better reporting systems for adverse events in clinical research.

Watch clip answer (00:06m)
Thumbnail

VICE News

00:48 - 00:54

How do compounding pharmacies operate under FDA regulations, and why are pharmaceutical companies trying to restrict their ability to compound certain medications?

Compounding pharmacies are authorized by the FDA to create medications when there's an official shortage or "backlog" of approved drugs. They can use the same molecules as patented drugs but modify delivery systems and dosages to serve patients when branded medications are unavailable. However, major pharmaceutical companies like Eli Lilly are using their political influence to pressure the FDA to remove drugs from the shortage list, even when they cannot meet market demand. This creates a conflict where life-saving emergency medications (like crash cart drugs in hospitals) rely heavily on compounding pharmacies due to low profit margins, yet Big Pharma seeks to eliminate this competition to expand their market control.

Watch clip answer (02:05m)
Thumbnail

VICE News

01:36:14 - 01:38:19

How did the opioid crisis transition from prescription medications to illegal drug use, and what role did various institutions play in this crisis?

The opioid crisis evolved through a chain of institutional failures and profit-driven decisions. Purdue Pharma deliberately misled the public about opioid addiction risks, while the FDA failed to provide adequate oversight. Insurance companies compounded the problem by creating barriers to proper treatment. When authorities finally tightened prescription regulations, patients who had become dependent on medications like OxyContin were forced to seek illegal alternatives like heroin on the streets. This transition was particularly devastating for populations like veterans, who received excessive prescriptions through the VA system and later found themselves navigating dangerous illegal drug markets despite having no prior experience with street drugs.

Watch clip answer (01:31m)
Thumbnail

VICE News

01:27:40 - 01:29:11

What is the pharmaceutical industry's approach to addressing childhood obesity in America?

Pharmaceutical companies are currently petitioning the FDA to expand GLP-1 drug indications for children under 12 and working with Congress to secure Medicare and Medicaid coverage for pediatric weight-loss treatments. This represents their primary solution to America's childhood obesity crisis - prescribing medication rather than addressing underlying causes. The speaker expresses concern about this medicalized approach, suggesting it may be excessive to put young children on weight-loss drugs as the primary intervention for obesity.

Watch clip answer (00:23m)
Thumbnail

VICE News

01:35:46 - 01:36:10

of4