Logo

Political Accountability

How has the perception of Saudi Arabia changed in global politics since the murder of Jamal Khashoggi?

Six years ago, after Jamal Khashoggi was killed in the Saudi consulate in Turkey, Saudi Arabia faced widespread condemnation and was labeled a 'pariah state' by both Republicans and Democrats in Washington. However, there's been a dramatic shift in how Saudi Arabia is viewed today, with economic interests seemingly overshadowing previous moral objections. This transformation reflects a concerning pattern in international relations where financial considerations take precedence over ethical standards. As Katty Kay notes, large sums of money exchanged in deals—whether related to Ukraine or Saudi Arabia—create opportunities for corruption and undermine our belief in consistent moral principles. This public amnesia about past wrongdoing raises critical questions about what principles democracies truly stand for.

Watch clip answer (01:25m)
Thumbnail

MSNBC

10:20 - 11:45

What hypocrisy did Nicolle Wallace highlight about Donald Trump regarding federal workers and golf?

Donald Trump recently criticized federal workers who work from home, specifically suggesting they were playing golf instead of fulfilling their professional responsibilities. This accusation reveals significant hypocrisy given Trump's own presidential record. During his first term, Trump spent considerable time on golf courses while ostensibly performing his duties as president. Wallace characterizes this criticism as 'glass housey,' pointing out the contradiction between Trump's accusations against remote workers and his own well-documented behavior of prioritizing golf during his time in office.

Watch clip answer (00:30m)
Thumbnail

MSNBC

00:17 - 00:48

What constitutional issues are at stake in the Trump administration's Supreme Court case regarding cuts and firings?

The Trump administration's Supreme Court case centers on the constitutional balance of power in government. Trump is attempting to remove career officials who typically serve across administrations, particularly those who investigate waste, fraud, and abuse like inspectors general and the Office of Special Counsel Director. This case could fundamentally alter modern American governance by allowing a president to replace professionally trained officials with loyalists. The core constitutional question involves whether Trump can make sweeping personnel changes based on allegations of fraud that are often unsupported by evidence. The Supreme Court will determine if the executive branch can dismiss officials who traditionally serve as independent watchdogs providing factual evaluations rather than partisan claims.

Watch clip answer (01:48m)
Thumbnail

NBC News

05:06 - 06:55

What is President Zelenskyy's response to Donald Trump's claims about Ukraine's leadership and elections?

Zelenskyy criticizes Trump's statements as echoing the Kremlin's false narrative that undermines Ukraine's legitimate government. Trump's comments about elections not being held suggest that Zelenskyy is an illegitimate leader, but this misrepresents the reality that elections have been legally postponed under martial law during the Russian invasion. This postponement is enshrined in Ukraine's constitution and is a legitimate response to the wartime situation, not an indication of illegitimacy as Trump's rhetoric implies.

Watch clip answer (00:16m)
Thumbnail

BBC News

08:15 - 08:32

Why does Jonathan Turley argue that President Trump has the right to examine government expenditures?

Jonathan Turley argues that Trump, elected by a majority of voters on a platform to reduce government size and eliminate waste, has both the mandate and responsibility to scrutinize government spending. Turley emphasizes the importance of examining financial records, stating 'You've got to look at the books... look at the receipts' to properly identify where government money is being allocated. Turley characterizes opposition to this scrutiny as 'a level of denial that borders on delusion,' highlighting the disconnect between Trump's clear electoral mandate and resistance to financial transparency in government operations. He supports the need for designated people to investigate government expenditures as part of fulfilling campaign promises to voters.

Watch clip answer (00:21m)
Thumbnail

Fox News

00:29 - 00:50

What executive orders did President Trump sign to improve American lives?

President Trump signed three executive orders addressing critical areas for Americans. The first focuses on making in vitro fertilization (IVF) and fertility treatments more affordable and accessible by directing the Domestic Policy Council to examine cost-reduction strategies. The second implements radical transparency requirements for government agencies, mandating that details of waste, fraud, abuse, and program cancellations be freely available to the public. The third establishes oversight functions for independent agencies through the Office of Management and Budget and reaffirms that only the President or Attorney General can officially represent the United States on legal matters.

Watch clip answer (01:43m)
Thumbnail

CBS News

01:02 - 02:45

of28