NATO Alliance
How will the US address concerns from EU countries who feel they've been sidelined in consultations about Ukraine?
According to Kurt Volker, former US Ambassador to NATO, these concerns from EU countries are not accurate. He explains that the US has been actively engaging with European partners through multiple channels, including NATO consultations, bilateral discussions, and meetings in various capitals. Volker's response indicates that rather than sidelining European allies, the US has maintained ongoing diplomatic communications regarding Ukraine through various established diplomatic mechanisms. His statement counters the perception that European nations have been excluded from important talks on the Ukraine situation.
Watch clip answer (00:28m)
Al Jazeera English
02:14 - 02:42
Is it possible to reach an agreement with Russia regarding Ukraine?
According to Kurt Volker, former US Ambassador to NATO, while a ceasefire might be possible, he remains very skeptical about reaching any meaningful agreement with Russia. This skepticism stems from Russia's maximalist objectives of eliminating Ukraine as a sovereign state. Volker emphasizes that Russia's fundamental goal of undermining Ukraine's sovereignty creates an insurmountable obstacle to genuine agreement, as no party would consent to the elimination of Ukraine's status as an independent nation. This fundamental contradiction in objectives makes substantive diplomatic progress extremely challenging.
Watch clip answer (00:14m)
Al Jazeera English
01:42 - 01:56
What challenges would the UK face in contributing troops to a peacekeeping mission in Ukraine?
The UK would face significant personnel and equipment limitations in contributing to a Ukraine peacekeeping mission. With only 75,000 full-time army personnel plus 24,000 reserves (many in non-combat roles), and troops already engaged in 60 operations across 44 countries, Britain lacks the capacity for a substantial deployment. A military expert explicitly states: "We haven't got the numbers and we haven't got the equipment to put a large force onto the ground for an extended period of time." Unlike previous peacekeeping missions in Bosnia or Sierra Leone, a Ukraine deployment would be much larger, lack UN/NATO protection, and face strong Russian opposition.
Watch clip answer (01:55m)
BBC News
00:01 - 01:56
What challenges would the UK face in contributing troops to a Ukraine peace deal?
The UK would face significant numerical and logistical challenges in contributing to a Ukraine peace mission. With only 75,000 full-time army personnel and 24,000 reserves (many in non-combat roles), British forces are already stretched thin supporting 60 operations across 44 countries worldwide. A Ukraine deployment would require substantial forces, with NATO estimating between 50,000-100,000 troops needed overall. Such a commitment would likely dwarf the UK's current military engagements and may not be realistic given existing obligations, despite the UK's apparent willingness to participate while other European nations like Poland and Germany express reluctance.
Watch clip answer (00:59m)
BBC News
00:01 - 01:00
What challenges does NATO face regarding troops in Ukraine as part of a peace deal?
According to the US Defense Secretary, any NATO forces deployed to Ukraine would not be protected by NATO's principle of collective defense, creating significant vulnerability. This limitation exists alongside Russia's firm stance that the presence of NATO troops in Ukraine as part of any peace deal is 'completely unacceptable.' These constraints create a complex diplomatic and military challenge. For the UK specifically, the Prime Minister's proposal would require substantially expanding British military capabilities and potentially accepting the risk of direct military engagement with Russia. This situation illustrates the delicate balance between peacekeeping ambitions and geopolitical realities in the ongoing Ukraine conflict.
Watch clip answer (00:29m)BBC News
01:26 - 01:55
What are the key implications of the UK Prime Minister's proposal regarding military involvement in Ukraine?
The Prime Minister's proposal would significantly expand the UK's military capabilities while indicating a willingness to potentially engage Russia or its proxies militarily if necessary. This represents a substantial shift in approach, acknowledging the dramatic changes in global security dynamics since previous decades. The proposal signals a readiness to increase military commitments in Ukraine despite infrastructure limitations and existing deployments, positioning the UK for a potentially expanded role in the ongoing conflict.
Watch clip answer (00:15m)BBC News
01:43 - 01:59