National Security
What role does Pakistan play in global terrorism according to India's statement at the UNSC?
According to Ambassador P. Harish's statement at the UNSC, Pakistan serves as the global epicenter of terrorism. The Indian representative highlighted that Pakistan harbors more than 20 UN-listed terrorist entities while promoting cross-border terrorism throughout the region. Harish specifically pointed out the irony of Pakistan's self-proclaimed role in fighting terrorism, given its substantial support for terrorist organizations. This statement was delivered during an open debate on multilateralism and global governance reform, where India called out Pakistan's contradictory stance on terrorism.
Watch clip answer (00:38m)How is India responding to Pakistan's claims about Kashmir at the United Nations?
India's Permanent Representative to the UN, P. Harish, has firmly warned Pakistan against spreading misinformation and disinformation regarding Kashmir. In response to Pakistan's claims about supporting Kashmiris' right to self-determination, Ambassador Harish has clarified India's position that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India. The ambassador has also highlighted Pakistan's role as a center of terrorism, pointing out that it harbors numerous UN-listed terrorist groups while claiming to fight terrorism. This response reflects India's consistent stance on countering Pakistan's narrative at international forums like the UN Security Council.
Watch clip answer (00:17m)What accusations did Ambassador P. Harish make against Pakistan during the UNSC debate?
During the UNSC debate on multilateralism and global governance, Ambassador P. Harish of India condemned Pakistan as the global epicenter of terrorism, pointing out that it harbors more than 20 UN-listed terrorist entities while promoting cross-border terrorism. Harish highlighted the irony of Pakistan's self-proclaimed role in fighting terrorism while actively supporting terrorist activities. His strong statement was part of India's broader position defending its territorial integrity regarding Jammu and Kashmir, addressing provocations from Pakistan's Foreign Minister and countering misinformation related to the region.
Watch clip answer (00:38m)What did US Secretary of State Marco Rubio discuss with European counterparts regarding Russia?
After meeting with the Russian delegation, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio briefed European counterparts via social media about the talks. During this exchange, top EU diplomat Kayakala conveyed concerns to Rubio, emphasizing that the US should avoid falling into traps set by Russia. The European officials specifically warned that Moscow's strategy aims to divide Western allies. This communication highlights the ongoing diplomatic efforts to maintain unity among Western nations while navigating complex negotiations with Russia during a period of heightened geopolitical tensions.
Watch clip answer (00:16m)What significant staffing change has the Trump administration made at the National Science Foundation?
The Trump administration recently fired more than 10% of the staff at the National Science Foundation (NSF), a critical institution founded in 1950 to promote science, engineering, U.S. defense, and public health. This represents a substantial reduction in workforce at an agency that provides a quarter of federal support for basic research at American colleges and universities. The NSF plays a vital role in funding key scientific infrastructure, including astronomy observatories and research stations in Antarctica. These staff cuts could potentially impact the foundation's ability to fulfill its mission of supporting essential scientific advancement and research across the nation.
Watch clip answer (00:32m)What is the main concern for Ukrainians regarding potential peace negotiations with Russia?
The main concern for Ukrainians is that if a peace deal is negotiated, Putin will simply bide his time and later return to take what he wants - similar to fears during the Vietnam War when Nixon worried North Vietnam would resume hostilities after U.S. withdrawal. Despite different circumstances (U.S. had troops on the ground in Vietnam but not in Ukraine), the fundamental security concern remains: without proper guarantees, an aggressor might temporarily retreat only to attack again when conditions are favorable. This comparison highlights the delicate balance between achieving immediate peace and ensuring long-term security in conflict resolution.
Watch clip answer (00:47m)