International Relations
What was India's stance on Jammu and Kashmir at the United Nations Security Council?
India's Ambassador P. Harish firmly reaffirmed at the UN Security Council that Jammu and Kashmir is and will remain an integral part of India. His statement emphasized the democratic choice made by the people of the Union territory in the Legislative assembly elections, establishing India's clear position on the matter. This declaration came in direct response to Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister Ishak Dar raising the Kashmir issue and claiming support for Kashmiris' right to self-determination. Ambassador Harish warned Pakistan against spreading misinformation and disinformation regarding Kashmir, reinforcing India's sovereign position.
Watch clip answer (00:36m)
WION
00:46 - 01:22
What makes Pakistan's recent Kashmir rhetoric at the UN Security Council significant?
Pakistan's Kashmir rhetoric at the UN Security Council is particularly significant now because Pakistan has become a non-permanent member of the UNSC for a two-year period, having taken charge on January 1st this year. This position provides Pakistan with a formal platform to raise the Kashmir issue internationally. According to Assistant Editor for Foreign Affairs Siddhant Sebald, this isn't the first time India has criticized Pakistan for raising Kashmir at the UN, but Pakistan's current UNSC membership makes this instance unique. Sebald warns to expect increased attempts to internationalize the Kashmir issue over the next few years as Pakistan leverages its temporary Security Council position.
Watch clip answer (00:28m)WION
01:55 - 02:23
How has India confronted Pakistan regarding terrorism at the United Nations Security Council?
At the UN Security Council, India strongly condemned Pakistan as an epicenter of terrorism, pointing out its role in spreading misinformation and supporting cross-border terrorism against India. India's representative highlighted that multiple terror attacks, including the worst attack on Indian soil (26/11), were perpetrated by Pakistani terrorists, yet Islamabad has taken no action to prevent such incidents. India specifically raised concerns about Pakistan harboring terrorist entities while simultaneously attempting to internationalize the Kashmir issue. This confrontation demonstrates India's continued effort to hold Pakistan accountable on the global stage for its alleged role in fostering terrorism, particularly as it relates to security concerns in Kashmir.
Watch clip answer (00:41m)WION
02:49 - 03:31
What challenges would the UK face in contributing troops to a peacekeeping mission in Ukraine?
The UK would face significant personnel and equipment limitations in contributing to a Ukraine peacekeeping mission. With only 75,000 full-time army personnel plus 24,000 reserves (many in non-combat roles), and troops already engaged in 60 operations across 44 countries, Britain lacks the capacity for a substantial deployment. A military expert explicitly states: "We haven't got the numbers and we haven't got the equipment to put a large force onto the ground for an extended period of time." Unlike previous peacekeeping missions in Bosnia or Sierra Leone, a Ukraine deployment would be much larger, lack UN/NATO protection, and face strong Russian opposition.
Watch clip answer (01:55m)
BBC News
00:01 - 01:56
What was the purpose of the US President's special envoy's visit to Ukraine amid the ongoing conflict?
The US President's special envoy on Russia and Ukraine visited Ukraine amid escalating tensions, though the outcome of these meetings remains unknown. This diplomatic visit occurred against a backdrop of increasing Russian military activities, including drone attacks in Odesa that left residents without power and heat during freezing conditions. The timing is significant as it coincides with an onslaught of comments from the US Administration directed toward President Zelensky. The visit appears to represent ongoing diplomatic efforts to address the conflict, even as the situation on the ground continues to deteriorate with critical infrastructure damage and humanitarian challenges mounting.
Watch clip answer (00:27m)
WION
03:07 - 03:35
What did Sanjeev Sanyal claim about USAID?
According to the clip, Sanjeev Sanyal, an economist and member of the Indian Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council, described USAID (United States Agency for International Development) as 'the biggest scam in human history.' This strong statement was made in response to claims about the organization's operations and effectiveness. Sanyal's characterization raises serious concerns about the transparency, accountability, and actual impact of U.S. foreign aid programs. His assessment suggests a fundamental criticism of how USAID allocates and utilizes its resources, implying that the agency may not be fulfilling its stated humanitarian mission as effectively as claimed.
Watch clip answer (00:12m)
WION
01:19 - 01:31