International Relations
How has the perception of Saudi Arabia changed in global politics since the murder of Jamal Khashoggi?
Six years ago, after Jamal Khashoggi was killed in the Saudi consulate in Turkey, Saudi Arabia faced widespread condemnation and was labeled a 'pariah state' by both Republicans and Democrats in Washington. However, there's been a dramatic shift in how Saudi Arabia is viewed today, with economic interests seemingly overshadowing previous moral objections. This transformation reflects a concerning pattern in international relations where financial considerations take precedence over ethical standards. As Katty Kay notes, large sums of money exchanged in deals—whether related to Ukraine or Saudi Arabia—create opportunities for corruption and undermine our belief in consistent moral principles. This public amnesia about past wrongdoing raises critical questions about what principles democracies truly stand for.
Watch clip answer (01:25m)
MSNBC
10:20 - 11:45
What was significant about the recent diplomatic talks in Saudi Arabia regarding the Ukraine war?
The talks in Riyadh marked a groundbreaking diplomatic event where Russian and American officials held four hours of discussions aimed at ending the war in Ukraine. What made these talks particularly significant was that neither Ukraine nor European nations were invited to participate. Instead, the US sent a separate envoy to meet Ukrainian officials in Kyiv. This arrangement has sparked considerable unease among European leaders, who held an emergency summit in Paris to discuss Ukraine and European security concerns regarding President Trump's plans to resolve the conflict. The exclusion of key stakeholders has raised questions about the future direction of negotiations.
Watch clip answer (01:09m)
BBC News
02:27 - 03:37
What is the significance of the recent US-Russia diplomatic meeting in Saudi Arabia?
The meeting in Saudi Arabia marked a historic breakthrough as high-level US and Russian diplomats met face-to-face for the first time in three years. This unprecedented dialogue between Ukraine's biggest backer and its enemy occurred amid rising European anxiety about President Trump's plans to resolve the Ukraine war. US representatives described the talks as 'upbeat and constructive,' with one official stating they were 'convinced' Russia was willing to engage in a serious process to end the war. However, Russia's position remained firm, with their foreign minister giving no sign of concessions while demanding Ukraine never join NATO and opposing any Western forces in Ukraine.
Watch clip answer (02:15m)BBC News
03:17 - 05:33
What does President Trump claim about his ability to end the war in Ukraine?
President Trump claims he is the only person in the world who can end the Ukraine war and believes he has the power to do so. He asserts that if he had been in the White House three years ago, the conflict would never have begun. Trump appears to blame Ukraine for not making a deal with Russia prior to the invasion, suggesting that he would have forced negotiations between the parties. His statements imply that Vladimir Putin would not have dared to invade Ukraine had Trump been President of the United States.
Watch clip answer (01:00m)
BBC News
00:00 - 01:00
What claims has Trump made about his ability to end the Ukraine war?
According to Sarah Smith's reporting, Trump has asserted that he possesses the unique power to end the ongoing Ukraine war. Speaking from Mar-a-Lago, he claimed that had he been in the White House three years ago, the conflict would never have started. Trump emphasized he could have brokered a deal preserving Ukraine's territory while avoiding casualties. These statements come amid high-level diplomatic talks between U.S. and Russian officials in Saudi Arabia aimed at resolving the three-year conflict, suggesting Trump is positioning himself as uniquely capable of achieving peace where current diplomatic efforts have struggled.
Watch clip answer (00:06m)
BBC News
00:29 - 00:36
What does President Zelensky believe is critical for any negotiations to end the war in Ukraine?
President Zelensky firmly believes that transparency and inclusion are essential for any negotiations aimed at ending the war in Ukraine. During his visit to Turkey (after canceling a trip to Saudi Arabia), he emphasized that peace talks should not occur 'behind the backs' of those most affected. Zelensky specifically stated that for Ukraine, their region, and Europe, it is critical that negotiations involve all stakeholders directly. His concern appears to be that diplomatic discussions between major powers like the U.S. and Russia might proceed without adequate Ukrainian participation, potentially undermining Ukraine's interests in any peace settlement.
Watch clip answer (00:17m)
BBC News
06:10 - 06:28