What is the critique of the argument that Nazis were necessary allies in post-WWII geopolitical conflicts?

The critique focuses on the absurdity of portraying Nazis as essential figures in combating communism after World War II. The speaker characterizes this perspective as treating former Nazi officials "like they're the avengers or some shit," highlighting the dangerous romanticization of fascist contributions to Cold War strategies. This viewpoint is challenged as a "weird take" that oversimplifies complex historical realities and potentially legitimizes fascist ideologies in contemporary political discourse. The critique suggests that such narratives blur important moral and ideological distinctions, particularly between liberalism and fascism. The discussion emphasizes how these historical interpretations can have serious repercussions in today's political landscape, where the resurgence of fascist rhetoric remains a concerning phenomenon that requires careful examination rather than casual acceptance.